Posted by
rycK on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:40:20 AM
Frank [the Crank] of the NYT Puts Up a Sloppy Diversion. McCain is Unknown?
We are always anxious to study and digest the facts as presented (and frequently misrepresented) by Frank [the Crank] Rich[1] [2]. Frank Rich is well known for his supernatural ability to crank out sophomoric dogmatic leftist literary brats with sausage-machine precision even when they apply to nothing in particular. He can sometimes identify a pratfall when it happens to a Clinton.[3]
The reading of the New York Times —aka the Walter Duranty Papers[4], is always exciting because the object of the daily game is to look for new forms of propaganda and fluff from their various authors and to then analyze how they were spun into the current web. In today’s episode we unexpectedly learn that nobody knows anything about McCain. This stunning revelation throws the election into chaos and shines a dark brown light on the efficacy of the summer polls. The voters must be ignorant and need to be educated.
So, let us have some fun with the latest Crankling:
“AS I went on vacation at the end of July, Barack Obama was leading John McCain by three to four percentage points in national polls. When I returned last week he still was. But lo and behold, a whole new plot twist had rolled off the bloviation assembly line in those intervening two weeks: Obama had lost the election!”-- The Candidate We Still Don’t Know[5] by Frank Rich Op-Ed Columnist. Published: August 16, 2008 [Emphasis] is mine in all quotes.]This link references all quotes in this essay unless otherwise stated.
A nonsensical piece of theatre that will amuse even the politically adept. He even uses an O’Reilly word [bloviation] in this comedy. What Frank is putting forth is that O’bama has not broached 49% in any of the polls—so he must be losing. He probably is. It is freak-out time at the Times.
The premise now mandates a search and grand exposition of things we do not know about McCain. These unknowns must be comes knowns and used to brainwash the electorate in the usual NYT manner, or at least try. Thus, ignorance can be transmutated into political victory in the fevered minds of the far left.
“He [Obama] should be passing the 50 percent mark in polls, and he’s not.”
News Flash! McCain is ahead 5%in the polls. [6]
The times do change!
Circular logic alert: if he is losing then he might not be running greater than 50%. Why is that not a possibility here. Numbers and their arithmetical manipulation are the pratfall of Times Propagandists as they frequently prove such non-facts as how Al Gore won the 2000 election with the popular vote, and lost all the recounts and also the Electoral College, so he must have been cheated out of his win.
“Obama has also been defeated by racism (again). He can’t connect and “close the deal” with ordinary Americans too doltish to comprehend a multicultural biography that includes what Cokie Roberts of ABC News has damned as the “foreign, exotic place” of Hawaii. As The Economist sums up the received wisdom, “lunch-pail Ohio Democrats” find Obama’s ideas of change “airy-fairy”[7] and are all asking, “Who on earth is this guy?”
Racism is, of course, the celebrated political pinnacle of the Party of Democrats as they must either grovel and drool at the feet of people like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharption or Malik Shabazz [8] or lose the election. As such the Times becomes not only an historical rubber stamp for the Communists it also must incorporate racism at every turn of the worm. The result is an “airy-fairy” caraciture like Obama: The Elegant left-liberal Afro-Leninist.[9] Many call him The Messiah. This ignorance essay is a perfect political concoction for all liberals to drink and tastes better than Kool-Aid. The liberals know the truth about Obama. Why not publish any lie or characer assination piece to get this guy elected? That is not lying in leftist terms.
The problem is that the unwashed white retards in contested states still remain bitter and cling to their guns and religion thus publically professing and beligerantly displaying their economic and social ignorance for all to see:
These dummies are portrayed thusly:
"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."[10]—Barack Obama off camera in what he thought was a safe environment to express his views.[11]
Such attitudes on the part of letist apologists and stooge-aping comentators are examples of the collective mental disorder called cryptomisoxeny.[12] Where is the educational piece from the Times on why Obama stuck with his racist pastor Jeremiah Wright for 20 years? Maybe he is hard of hearing? That might have already cost him the election. Do we really live in KKK Amerika? In the progression of this social disease the crusade to stamp out racism by the left employs the identical racist and bigoted language, unsavory manuevers and other attributes that they nosily identify in their so-called racist enemies. Thus the notion of hypocrisy is expediently concealed and the political benefits of racial polarization can be exploited while remaining aloof and immune from accusations of overt, functional racism. This is a neat, but slimy trick used by propagandists. The NYT excels in such racism.
The reflexive rebound of this theme is now to be examined:
What do we really know about Obama?
Here is a tidy list of unanswered/and or suppressed questions about The Messiah:
[1] Where are his medical records? McCain submitted hundreds of pages of his records.
[2] Where are the Illinois state records of Obama for his first few years? Missing?
[3] Was he really a ‘professor’ or law at U. Chicago or was he just an adjunct lecturer? Where are his Law Review articles and court cases?
[4] Why did he become so friendly with William Ayers, a known terrorist? Was his mentor ‘Frank” a known CPUSA operative?
[5] How did Obama really vote on the issue of killing fetuses after an unsuccessful abortion?[13] Did he really vote to murder a child after a successful birth? Maybe the Times can explain this to the unwashed.
[6] What are Obama’s connections to Marxism and his real views on capitalism?[14]
[7] How could he possibly pay for all his ‘promises’ without doubling taxes?
Using the humdrum tactic of juxtapositioning the facts, the Walter Duranty Papers attempts to throw the uncertainty of knowledge upon Obama’s opponent. It is O’Bozo[15] that we need to hear more about. We all know about John McCain and still wonder how he was selected as the Republican candidate after digesting all the negative and highly-detailed information we already have about him. This artificial propaganda mechanism used by Frank Rich would have been spit out with the customary sausage machine elegance he employs no matter who ran against Obama. This is turnstile political polemics from the Times, as usual.
They have nothing left but a blend of hate, rabid anti-capitalism and exoteric racism to put on their op-ed pages. This in one of them. We can learn a lot about the far left by reading screeds like this.
rycK
Comments to: ryckki@gmail.com
[4] In honor of that celebrated Communist stooge and liar and winner of the Pulitzer Prize for the NYT. The color RED is used in my essays in honor of Walter Duranty, a saint, if there could be one, in the Marxist Archives of Honor.
[7] A bigoted slur against people who are not gay and liberal.
[10] http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/356191.aspx
[11] http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9111UBG0&show_article=1
[12] Cryptomisoxeny Explained by Theory and Examples.
http://rycksrationalizations.blogtownhall.com/2008/05/09/cryptomisoxeny_explained_by_theory_and__examples.thtml
“This is a serious mental affliction that infects almost everybody in the world where people use hypocrisy, bigotry and racism to ferret out the hypocrites, bigots and racists with the grand feeling that they are absent these negative attributes and are performing tasks related to justice or other delusion. It is good to root out and display the racists and the reward is wild applause, contentment and a feeling of well being. Cryptomisoxeny propels tribalism and religious bigotry to higher and higher levels with modern communication methods and ensures that these social factors will persist to infinity.”
[14] It’s clear from Sen. Obama’s own writings and speeches that he too is no fan of business or our system of “chaotic and unforgiving capitalism,” as he wrote in “Audacity.” He’s fond of bashing Wall Street “greed” and the post-Reagan rise of individual investing over government investing. He wants to roll back the “Ownership Society.” He resents the profit motive and individuals “on the make.” –Mark Levin. http://marklevinfan.com/